Damp and timber surveys.

As founder of the Building Lime Company, I used to lecture on the use of lime mortars and the practical conservation of historic buildings. As the owner of one of the countries’ largest independent damp proofing companies we resolved thousands of damp and timber issues while protecting clients and historic properties from unnecessary costs and inappropriate systems and chemicals.

Why would I need an independent surveyor?

Most damp and timber surveys are carried out by surveyors working for contracting companies. Very often the surveyors carry out a free survey but are paid commission for the value of work they produce. This is certainly the case with many national companies.

This can put surveyors under pressure to find as much work as possible.

Then there are the independent heritage “surveyors” who are in complete denial of rising or even penetrating damp and will just advocate allowing a property to “breathe” to disprove the presence of dampness to impress consumers because they know this is what the client wants to hear, For this they then earn a fee but very often they leave the consumer with no practical solution to the very evident problem.

This leaves the consumer with a real and ongoing problem or the inappropriate and expensive use of lime mortars on an unresolved damp problem.

An independent qualified and experienced surveyor has no commercial or reputational gain from finding or not finding work to be done.

We do not advocate the use of chemical DPCs but we do try and find the cause of dampness and produce practical remedies that work.

You should expect a full holistic assessment of damp and timber issues within the agreed scope of the survey.

A written report documenting defects and an action plan for remedying the problem or proposing further inspections where necessary.

Condensation not rising causing damp

The Survey

As preservation surveyors we are qualified and experienced with damp proofing and timber decay,

 As former owners of the Building Lime Company  we made lime plasters, sold lime plasters and lectured on the use of lime and repair of earth structures we also have a vast knowledge of lime for building and sympathetic historic building repairs.

We will always look for the compromise between conserving the historic features of a building and preserving a building in a condition so as it can be lived in comfortably.

Surveying for Damp Issues with Historic Buildings.

Building’s fall into two categories for the purposes of surveying for damp. Modern buildings built with a damp proof course and barriers to rainwater penetration, and old buildings built prior to mid to late 19th century depending on the region of the country. Old buildings relied on the walls breathing and shedding moisture before damp became a problem.

In old buildings, walls were built thick enough so that damp could not penetrate to the inside. The masonry bedding materials were always lime mortars or earth. When constructing buildings, the joints were often more porous than the rest of the building elements such as brick or stone. This was so that the joints would drain and shed water by evaporation, preventing long term damage to the masonry. Of all the elements found in a building, the joints were the sacrificial element. As lime and earth mortars are so porous, timber that are in contact with lime mortar is less prone to decay as opposed to when timber is bedded inside of cement mortar.

When built, historic houses did breathe and shed water compared to modern buildings. They were also heated by coal or log fires in an open fireplace which promoted rapid air changes within the building, through air being drawn out through the chimney. Windows and doors were not sealed as they are today which allowed air movement through the building. Internal finishes were lime wash which allowed surfaces to “ breathe “. Although it would discolour when damp, it would not peal from the wall like wallpaper or blister like modern impervious paint.

Over the year’s most historic houses and buildings have been altered to suit our modern lifestyle, nearly always to the detriment of the building. The heating has been changed so we don’t have the same type of air changes. Windows and doors have now been sealed and draught proofed changing the way air flows through the building.

Some of these buildings  have had water from the ground rise into the walls through capillary action. Water from the ground contains salts. Initially for many years the moisture in the walls would evaporate off harmlessly outside during fine dry weather, and inside, because of the rapid air changes induced by the open fire heating drawing air rapidly up the chimney.

When water from the ground evaporates, the soluble salts it previously contained are left in the walls at the point from which it had evaporated. This would be within the surface of the masonry or inside of plaster finishes.

This as an aside is the proof that damp rises. The rising damp deniers  acknowledge that salt bands are found in walls, as do leading and revered conservationists such as John Ashurst and SPAB the society for Protection of Ancient Buildings but none of them can explain how the salts get into the walls other than by moisture rising up the wall and depositing salts when it evaporates.

In time salts block the pores and cause damp to rise further up the walls to evaporate.

A proportion of salts are also hydroscopic and, in humid conditions  will attract moisture to the wall causing a damp area. Sometimes there is a visible salt band and blistering and staining of finishes and plaster caused by salts.

In many old buildings, floors have been concreted over the top of a plastic sheet. This reduces the area of evaporation for moisture from the floor, this can possibly cause more moisture to rise into the walls.

Modern paints and finishes are often applied in place of lime wash further reducing evaporation and compounding the damp issues.

Ground levels are often raised higher than the original, often above the plinth in earth structures, and sometimes above the level of the internal floors. These problems along with defective Drainage, roofing, joinery, rainwater goods, chimneys’, pointing etc., can cause excessive damp in old properties. To compound this problem houses were often painted or rendered externally with inappropriate materials.

Rendering and painting reduce evaporation significantly from the outside surface of the wall, and cause damp to rise further up the wall and to appear on the inside.

Renders crack and allow water to penetrate through, either by capillary action into fine cracks or directly as penetration into larger cracks and de bonded areas. The water is then trapped behind the render and can penetrate to the inside.

 All the above means that by the 21st century a great many old traditionally built houses have damp problems often caused over the last 100 years, by changes in heating and finishes, these damp problems have not been addressed due to a lack of knowledge and understanding of older buildings, traditional materials and the way they work together.

Conservation vs Preservation of Historic Buildings

People buying houses, for the most part, expect the house to be weatherproof with a dry interior. Conservation of houses means they must be owned and lived in to be cared for, which also means they must be fit for this purpose.

How to conserve these houses and make them fit for purpose.

Conservationists want as little intervention into the property as possible, this is so that they maintain any historic fabric and features of the original property. The house and its features can then be preserved and passed down to future generations, which is commendable, but it does mean living in a damp house and most people will not do that.

Many firmly believe when a property is damp, lime plastering and the application of lime wash can reverse the damp problem by allowing the wall to ”breathe”.

Lime mortars cannot cure the problems in a house which has damp issues unless the real cause of the  damp is established, and the issues is are resolved.

So, where lime is used usually problems re occur, and the home owner is left with expensive remedial work.

At the other end of the scale, some preservation companies who consider any visual damp, or worse, damp recorded on a damp meter around ground floor walls to be indicative of a rising damp problem will recommend the insertion of a damp proof course followed by hard moisture resistant sand cement render, which is often detrimental to the older traditionally built building. This leads to even more issues and damaging work.

Thankfully it isn’t a case of being a specialist in one or the other. There are experienced building professionals found in both the conservation and preservation industries, who understand the importance of keeping older properties in good condition so that they can be preserved, they can however also identify historically important elements and features which must be left almost untouched and conserved.

These types of surveyors realise the practical issues of carrying out long term repairs and treatments, so they can communicate with the occupants to make the right decisions. Allowing the occupants to enjoy their building and continue to look after it.

Services

  • Damp surveys
  • Timber surveys
  • Pre project surveys report and recommended remedial works.
  • Damp problem investigation.
  • Historic building damp issues advice and recommendations.
  • CPD training on damp surveys and remedial options